Friday, April 19, 2024
Mic Drop Politics
Most Popular

James O’Keefe and Project Veritas Fighting Back With Help From Others

Larry Johnson November 16, 2021 Uncategorized Comments Off on James O’Keefe and Project Veritas Fighting Back With Help From Others

The following cartoon accurately portrays the absurdity and evil of the FBI raid on Project Veritas and James O’Keefe.

Photo credit: Resist the Mainstream 

Even if the diary was “stolen”, its objective value (i.e., the actual price to buy the book) is less than $50. This is barely misdemeanor territory and certainly does not qualify as a Federal crime requiring the thuggery of the FBI.

Fortunately, some in the leftist media now recognize the danger if this is allowed to go unchallenged. This is a gross violation of the First Amendment and represents an existential threat to the freedom of the press. Some are starting to fight back. The Reporters Committee for Freedom of the Press, for example, released the following:

And Senator Tom Cotton has weighed in with a metaphorical club upside the head of Attorney General Garland Merrick via a letter demanding the following:

A. Please provide any case where federal prosecutors charged conspiracy to transport stolen goods and/or reciept of stolen goods with respect to a journalist recieving information from a source and describe how that comports with the First Amendment protections articulated in Bartnicki v. Vopper.
B. Please provide all cases where federal prosecutors charged NSPA where a personal effect such as a diary had been stolen in an isolated incident.
C. Please provide the search warrants for any cellphones collected from O’Keefe and his associates as well as the supporting applications
D. Please provide all federal prosecutions where prosecutors charged transportation of stolen property where a good had been abandoned by the complaining owner
E. The NSPA has a jurisdictional requirement that the property stolen have a value of $5,000 or more. Please provide the process in which you assessed Ashley Biden’s diary as having a fair market value of $5,000 or more.

Heavens! Even the morally bankrupt ACLU grudgingly weighed in with a backhanded admission that DOJ was treading in dangerous waters:

“Project Veritas has engaged in disgraceful deceptions, and reasonable observers might not consider their activities to be journalism at all. Nevertheless, the precedent set in this case could have serious consequences for press freedom. Unless the government had good reason to believe that Project Veritas employees were directly involved in the criminal theft of the diary, it should not have subjected them to invasive searches and seizures. We urge the court to appoint a special master to ensure that law enforcement officers review only those materials that were lawfully seized and that are directly relevant to a legitimate criminal investigation.””

The lefties remain pissed that O’Keefe and his peeps have been very effective in exposing the lies and their evil deeds, but the Department of Justice and the FBI invasion of a journalist enterprise sets a dangerous precedent if left unchallenged.

There appears to be at least one honorable Federal judge still sitting on the bench. District Court Judge Analisa Torres from the Southern District of New York:

 [O]rdered the Department of Justice to stop extracting data from the phones of Project Veritas founder James O’Keefe days after his home was raided by the FBI as part of an investigation into the missing diary belonging to President Biden’s daughter, Ashley Biden.

Regardless of your feelings regarding James O’Keefe and the work of Project Veritas, you must THINK about the principle involved. Our freedom as citizens depends on a free press. Someone has to watch the watchers.

The post James O’Keefe and Project Veritas Fighting Back With Help From Others appeared first on The Gateway Pundit.

Like this Article? Share it!

About The Author


Most Popular

These content links are provided by Content.ad. Both Content.ad and the web site upon which the links are displayed may receive compensation when readers click on these links. Some of the content you are redirected to may be sponsored content. View our privacy policy here.

To learn how you can use Content.ad to drive visitors to your content or add this service to your site, please contact us at [email protected].

Family-Friendly Content

Website owners select the type of content that appears in our units. However, if you would like to ensure that Content.ad always displays family-friendly content on this device, regardless of what site you are on, check the option below. Learn More



Most Popular
Sponsored Content

These content links are provided by Content.ad. Both Content.ad and the web site upon which the links are displayed may receive compensation when readers click on these links. Some of the content you are redirected to may be sponsored content. View our privacy policy here.

To learn how you can use Content.ad to drive visitors to your content or add this service to your site, please contact us at [email protected].

Family-Friendly Content

Website owners select the type of content that appears in our units. However, if you would like to ensure that Content.ad always displays family-friendly content on this device, regardless of what site you are on, check the option below. Learn More

Comments are closed.